This is shown very clearly on the Google map below (marked with "x"). I was trying to follow a knife-edge moraine magnetic-west to a broad spot where the moraine briefly flattened at a spot that presumably wasn't glacier carved at the last advance. Let's compare maps of my adventures last weekend. Share your tips and opinions below if you wish. Funny that it's twice the price, probably because the price includes shipping. Since I almost never carry a printed map anymore, it's nice to find one that is sold flat. I like some things about it, but it's disappointing in other respects (as expected hard to imagine any one map will be best by all criteria). I suppose I'd have to spend some time with the full-size map before I could say. Hard to tell from an online preview screen. Webfoot asked what I think of Adventure Maps' offering. For example, trails sometimes "disappear" when they run parallel to contour lines (as trails tend to do). One complaint about the Geo-Graphics is it can be a little hard to read. Although roads and trails can change at any time, my antique map is sometimes more accurate than my new-ish maps. Snowfields and glaciers are accurately portrayed (funny that after thirty years of retreat, Geo-Graphics still shows where the snow is better than modern maps). I like the fact that it shows abandoned trails, which can be fun to look for (three decades later, some remnants can be found). My 1990 Geo-Graphics is most reliable for both natural features and man-made features. Actually, I dislike all maps, but some are better than others. I dislike my two printed Hood maps: Green Trails and Nat Geo. Continuing a discussion that started elsewhere:
0 kommentar(er)
